The So-Called Oded Yinon Plan

Outlining The Zionist Plan For A Greater Israel

I have finally come to the point where I will do a post on the plan that gave me my pseudonym. Oded Yinon’s writing will be in italic. I have not included everything in the document. Just the parts I find interesting or worthy of a comment

The political, social and economic views which have emanated from this foundation have been based on several "truths" which are presently disappearing--for example, the view that man as an individual is the center of the universe and everything exists in order to fulfill his basic material needs. This position is being invalidated in the present when it has become clear that the amount of resources in the cosmos does not meet Man's requirements, his economic needs or his demographic constraints. In a world in which there are four billion human beings and economic and energy resources which do not grow proportionally to meet the needs of mankind, it is unrealistic to expect to fulfill the main requirement of Western Society, i.e., the wish and aspiration for boundless consumption. The view that ethics plays no part in determining the direction Man takes, but rather his material needs do--that view is becoming prevalent today as we see a world in which nearly all values are disappearing. We are losing the ability to assess the simplest things, especially when they concern the simple question of what is Good and what is Evil.

This partial first paragraph is alarming in and of itself. When we read this and look back 43 years it is easy to understand that a) he knew what he was talking about, and b) I suspect this document will read like a history book of the last four decades.

We are living today in the early stages of a new epoch in human history which is not at all similar to its predecessor, and its characteristics are totally different from what we have hitherto known.

Yes, Reagan and Thatcher are the two people who symbolize that era.

The political, social and economic views which have emanated from this foundation have been based on several "truths" which are presently disappearing--for example, the view that man as an individual is the center of the universe and everything exists in order to fulfill his basic material needs.

Speak for yourself and your ilk, Mr Yinon. I have never had a megalomaniical view of myself as you describe here.

This position is being invalidated in the present when it has become clear that the amount of resources in the cosmos does not meet Man's requirements, his economic needs or his demographic constraints. In a world in which there are four billion human beings and economic and energy resources which do not grow proportionally to meet the needs of mankind, it is unrealistic to expect to fulfill the main requirement of Western Society, i.e., the wish and aspiration for boundless consumption.

Here we have another eugenicist’s writings on full display. The claim that there is not enough resources on earth for everyone here is a lie. As for the boundless consumption you are talking about….. Because of the wealthiest 1% on the planet’s insatiable apetite for resources, they have to get rid of us so that they can continue the party.

The view that ethics plays no part in determining the direction Man takes, but rather his material needs do--that view is becoming prevalent today as we see a world in which nearly all values are disappearing.

Again, Reagan and Thatcher. After they were done the only value left was $, £ and ¥.

We are losing the ability to assess the simplest things, especially when they concern the simple question of what is Good and what is Evil.

I agree that the globalists have thrown ethics overboard, and very many people today fail to understand, and see the difference between good and evil.

The vision of man's limitless aspirations and abilities shrinks in the face of the sad facts of life, when we witness the break-up of world order around us. The view which promises liberty and freedom to mankind seems absurd in light of the sad fact that three fourths of the human race lives under totalitarian regimes.

Who is to blame for that sad fact, Mr. Yinon? The banksters are. Last time I checked 999 of a thousand of them were crypto Jewish Zionists like yourself.

The views concerning equality and social justice have been transformed by socialism and especially by Communism into a laughing stock. There is no argument as to the truth of these two ideas, but it is clear that they have not been put into practice properly and the majority of mankind has lost the liberty, the freedom and the opportunity for equality and justice. In this nuclear world in which we are (still) living in relative peace for thirty years, the concept of peace and coexistence among nations has no meaning when a superpower like the USSR holds a military and political doctrine of the sort it has: that not only is a nuclear war possible and necessary in order to achieve the ends of Marxism, but that it is possible to survive after it, not to speak of the fact that one can be victorious in it.

In the post 9/11 era the United States has turned into a totalitarian police state with an increasing number of people at the top having an obvious Marxist agenda.

The vision of man's limitless aspirations and abilities shrinks in the face of the sad facts of life, when we witness the break-up of world order around us. The view which promises liberty and freedom to mankind seems absurd in light of the sad fact that three fourths of the human race lives under totalitarian regimes. The views concerning equality and social justice have been transformed by socialism and especially by Communism into a laughing stock. There is no argument as to the truth of these two ideas, but it is clear that they have not been put into practice properly and the majority of mankind has lost the liberty, the freedom and the opportunity for equality and justice. In this nuclear world in which we are (still) living in relative peace for thirty years, the concept of peace and coexistence among nations has no meaning when a superpower like the USSR holds a military and political doctrine of the sort it has: that not only is a nuclear war possible and necessary in order to achieve the ends of Marxism, but that it is possible to survive after it, not to speak of the fact that one can be victorious in it. The essential concepts of human society, especially those of the West, are undergoing a change due to political, military and economic transformations. Thus, the nuclear and conventional might of the USSR has transformed the epoch that has just ended into the last respite before the great saga that will demolish a large part of our world in a multi-dimensional global war, in comparison with which the past world wars will have been mere child's play. The power of nuclear as well as of conventional weapons, their quantity, their precision and quality will turn most of our world upside down within a few years, and we must align ourselves so as to face that in Israel. That is, then, the main threat to our existence and that of the Western world. The war over resources in the world, the Arab monopoly on oil, and the need of the West to import most of its raw materials from the Third World, are transforming the world we know, given that one of the major aims of the USSR is to defeat the West by gaining control over the gigantic resources in the Persian Gulf and in the southern part of Africa, in which the majority of world minerals are located. We can imagine the dimensions of the global confrontation which will face us in the future.

I see now, Mr. Oded Yinon, that you are the Yuval Noah Harari of 1982. You give me hope that also he can be wrong in his predictions. What you wrote here is what many expect to happen in the near future. You didn’t count on the collapse of the Warsaw Pact and the Soviet Union nine years after your book was published. One could only hope for a similar disruptive event that derails the globalist freigh train, and soon.

Failing to take steps towards the Arab population in the new territories, acquired in the course of a war forced upon us, is the major strategic error committed by Israel on the morning after the Six Day War. We could have saved ourselves all the bitter and dangerous conflict since then if we had given Jordan to the Palestinians who live west of the Jordan river. By doing that we would have neutralized the Palestinian problem which we nowadays face, and to which we have found solutions that are really no solutions at all, such as territorial compromise or autonomy which amount, in fact, to the same thing.

Here we see the loonacy in the form of regreting not having repeated history. The UK gave the Palestinian’s land away to the Zionist Khazarian Mafia, and Oded Yinon regrets not having given the Jordanian’s land to the Palestinians. Two wrongs don’t make a right, Mr. Yinon.

(Regaining) the Sinai peninsula with its present and potential resources is therefore a political priority which is obstructed by the Camp David and the peace agreements. The fault for that lies of course with the present Israeli government and the governments which paved the road to the policy of territorial compromise, the Alignment governments since 1967. The Egyptians will not need to keep the peace treaty after the return of the Sinai, and they will do all they can to return to the fold of the Arab world and to the USSR in order to gain support and military assistance. American aid is guaranteed only for a short while, for the terms of the peace and the weakening of the U.S. both at home and abroad will bring about a reduction in aid. Without oil and the income from it, with the present enormous expenditure, we will not be able to get through 1982 under the present conditions and we will have to act in order to return the situation to the status quo which existed in Sinai prior to Sadat's visit and the mistaken peace agreement signed with him in March 1979.

The Egyptians will not need to keep the peace treaty after the return of the Sinai? They did, didn’t they? Mistaken peace treaty? This is just more evidence of the constantly disingenuous Israeli government which always negotiates in bad faith. On the day of atonement the Talmudists swing a chicken over their heads, and all the lies they told in the past year are forgiven.

American aid isguaranteed only for a short while? Wrong again, Mr. Yinon. This is fear mongering propaganda. American aid went into high gear after the JFK assassination, and has increased every year ever since. After 9/11 it went into overdrive.

The Western front, which on the surface appears more problematic, is in fact less complicated than the Eastern front, in which most of the events that make the headlines have been taking place recently. Lebanon's total dissolution into five provinces serves as a precendent for the entire Arab world including Egypt, Syria, Iraq and the Arabian peninsula and is already following that track. The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unqiue areas such as in Lebanon, is Israel's primary target on the Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power of those states serves as the primary short term target. Syria will fall apart, in accordance with its ethnic and religious structure, into several states such as in present day Lebanon, so that there will be a Shi'ite Alawi state along its coast, a Sunni state in the Aleppo area, another Sunni state in Damascus hostile to its northern neighbor, and the Druzes who will set up a state, maybe even in our Golan, and certainly in the Hauran and in northern Jordan. This state of affairs will be the guarantee for peace and security in the area in the long run, and that aim is already within our reach today.

Here Mr. Yinon is basically describing what General Clark said about a list at the Pentagon immediately after 9/11. A list of I forgot how many countries that would be attacked in the near future.

Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel's targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon.

An Iraq-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart? Wrong yet again, Mr. Yinon. It didn’t. Neither did the Gulf War, nor did more than a decade of sanctions. Israel needed its minion in the Oval Orifice to help it with some shock and awe. Is it just me, or does anyone else see a patern here.

In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi'ite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north. It is possible that the present Iranian-Iraqi confrontation will deepen this polarization.

Here we have another “prediction” as none of this has yet come about, and may never due to the more or less permanent US presens with the worlds by far largest “embassy” ever built.

The entire Arabian peninsula is a natural candidate for dissolution due to internal and external pressures, and the matter is inevitable especially in Saudi Arabia. Regardless of whether its economic might based on oil remains intact or whether it is diminished in the long run, the internal rifts and breakdowns are a clear and natural development in light of the present political structure.

More “predictions” which proves in spades that this document is used as a playbook. Yemen has been “under attack” for years already, but it’s taking much more time than the globalists were hoping for.

Jordan constitutes an immediate strategic target in the short run but not in the long run, for it does not constitute a real threat in the long run after its dissolution, the termination of the lengthy rule of King Hussein and the transfer of power to the Palestinians in the short run.

There is no chance that Jordan will continue to exist in its present structure for a long time, and Israel's policy, both in war and in peace, ought to be directed at the liquidation of Jordan under the present regime and the transfer of power to the Palestinian majority. Changing the regime east of the river will also cause the termination of the problem of the territories densely populated with Arabs west of the Jordan. Whether in war or under conditions of peace, emigrationfrom the territories and economic demographic freeze in them, are the guarantees for the coming change on both banks of the river, and we ought to be active in order to accelerate this process in the nearest future. The autonomy plan ought also to be rejected, as well as any compromise or division of the territories for, given the plans of the PLO and those of the Israeli Arabs themselves, the Shefa'amr plan of September 1980, it is not possible to go on living in this country in the present situation without separating the two nations, the Arabs to Jordan and the Jews to the areas west of the river. Genuine coexistence and peace will reign over the land only when the Arabs understand that without Jewish rule between the Jordan and the sea they will have neither existence nor security. A nation of their own and security will be theirs only in Jordan.

Yet more “predictions” as none of this has happened yet either. Still it is evidence that Jordan is on the list of regime change nations.

It should be clear, under any future political situation or mifitary (probably a typo: military, maybe?) constellation, that the solution of the problem of the indigenous Arabs will come only when they recognize the existence of Israel in secure borders up to the Jordan river and beyond it, as our existential need in this difficult epoch, the nuclear epoch which we shall soon enter. It is no longer possible to live with three fourths of the Jewish population on the dense shoreline which is so dangerous in a nuclear epoch.

“…as our existential need in this difficult epoch, the nuclear epoch which we shall soon enter.” Liar, liar, pants on fire! Israel has, as we all know, been a nuclear power since the sixties. The “self-hating Jew” by the name of Mordachai Wanunu let us in on Israels dirty little secret in Dimona long before Oded Yinon penned this paper. He also paid a heavy price for that.

Dispersal of the population is therefore a domestic strategic aim of the highest order; otherwise, we shall cease to exist within any borders. Judea, Samaria and the Galilee are our sole guarantee for national existence, and if we do not become the majority in the mountain areas, we shall not rule in the country and we shall be like the Crusaders, who lost this country which was not theirs anyhow, and in which they were foreigners to begin with.

Now who’s calling the kettle black? An East European Ashkenazim Khazar is no more a native of Palestine, and has no more right to it than a Scandinavian Crusader.

Rebalancing the country demographically, strategically and economically is the highest and most central aim today. Taking hold of the mountain watershed from Beersheba to the Upper Galilee is the national aim generated by the major strategic consideration which is settling the mountainous part of the country that is empty of Jews today.

Yes, Mr. Yinon. They are called illegal settlments.

Rebalancing the country demographically, strategically and economically is the highest and most central aim today. Taking hold of the mountain watershed from Beersheba to the Upper Galilee is the national aim generated by the major strategic consideration which is settling the mountainous part of the country that is empty of Jews today.

I have never been to Palestine, so I don’t know how far the process “settling the mountanous part of the country has come, but at least now we know what comes next.

We need to change from a centralized economy in which the government is extensively involved, to an open and free market as well as to switch from depending upon the U.S. taxpayer to developing, with our own hands, of a genuine productive economic infrastructure. If we are not able to make this change freely and voluntarily, we shall be forced into it by world developments, especially in the areas of economics, energy, and politics, and by our own growing isolation.

What you fail to realise, Mr. Yinon, is that people are lazy. It is easier for the Israeli government to cyphon money right out of the US Treasury, and as long as US citizens are too lazy to look at how Israel is stealing from them, the Israeli government can just keep it up.

If you like you can read, or even download the entire documen here.